TreeSet, LinkedHashSet and HashSet all are
implementation of Set interface and by virtue of that, they follows contract of Set interface i.e. they do not allow duplicate elements.
Despite being from same type hierarchy, there are lot of difference between them;
which is important to understand, so that you can choose most appropriate Set implementation based upon
your requirement. By the way difference between TreeSet and HashSet or LinkedHashSet is also
one of the popular Java Collection interview
question, not as popular as Hashtable vs HashMap or ArrayList vs Vector but still
appears in various Java interviews. In this article we will see difference between HashSet, TreeSet and LinkedHashSet on various points e.g. Ordering of elements,
performance, allowing null etc and then we will see When to use TreeSet or LinkedHashSet or simply HashSet
in Java.
Difference between TreeSet, LinkedHashSet
and HashSet in Java
TreeSet, LinkedHashSet and HashSet in Javaare three Set implementation in collection framework and like many others they
are also used to store objects. Main feature of TreeSet is
sorting, LinkedHashSet is
insertion order and HashSet is just general purpose
collection for storing object. HashSet is implemented using HashMap in Java while TreeSet
is implemented using TreeMap. TreeSet is a SortedSet
implementation which allows it to keep elements in the sorted order defined by
either Comparable or Comparator interface.
Comparable is used for natural order sorting and Comparator for custom order sorting of
objects, which can be provided while creating instance of TreeSet. Anyway before seeing
difference between TreeSet, LinkedHashSet and HashSet, let's see
some similarities between them:
1) Duplicates : All three implements Set interface means they are
not allowed to store duplicates.
2) Thread safety : HashSet, TreeSet and LinkedHashSet are not thread-safe, if you use them
in multi-threading environment where at least one Thread modifies Set you need to externally synchronize them.
3) Fail-Fast Iterator : Iterator returned by TreeSet, LinkedHashSet and HashSet are fail-fast Iterator. i.e. If
Iterator is modified after its creation by any way other than Iterators remove() method, it
will throw ConcurrentModificationException with best
of effort. read more about fail-fast vs fail-safe Iterator
here
Now let’s see difference between HashSet, LinkedHashSet and TreeSet in
Java :
Performance and Speed
: First difference between them comes in terms of speed. HashSet is
fastest, LinkedHashSet is second on performance or
almost similar to HashSet but TreeSet is bit
slower because of sorting operation it needs to perform on each insertion. TreeSet provides
guaranteed O(log(n)) time for common operations like
add, remove and contains, while HashSet and LinkedHashSet offer
constant time performance e.g. O(1) for add, contains and remove given hash
function uniformly distribute elements in bucket.
Ordering : HashSet does not
maintain any order while LinkedHashSet maintains insertion order of elements much like List interface and TreeSet maintains
sorting order or elements.
Internal
Implementation : HashSet is backed by an HashMap
instance, LinkedHashSet is implemented using HashSet and
LinkedList while TreeSet is backed up by NavigableMap in Java
and by default it uses TreeMap.
null : Both HashSet and LinkedHashSet allows
null but TreeSet doesn't allow null but TreeSet doesn't allow
null and throw java.lang.NullPointerException
when you will insert null into TreeSet. Since TreeSet uses compareTo() method of
respective elements to compare them
which throws NullPointerException while comparing with null,
here is an example:
TreeSet cities
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at
java.lang.String.compareTo(String.java:1167)
at
java.lang.String.compareTo(String.java:92)
at
java.util.TreeMap.put(TreeMap.java:545)
at
java.util.TreeSet.add(TreeSet.java:238)
Comparison : HashSet and LinkedHashSet uses equals() method in Java for comparison but TreeSet uses compareTo() method for
maintaining ordering. That's why compareTo() should be
consistent to equals in Java. failing to do so break general contact of Set
interface i.e. it can permit duplicates.
TreeSet vs HashSet vs LinkedHashSet - Example
Let’s compare all these Set implementation on some points by writing Java
program. In this example we are demonstrating difference in ordering, time
taking while inserting 1M records among TreeSet, HashSet and LinkedHashSet in Java.
This will help to solidify some points which discussed in earlier section and
help to decide when to use HashSet, LinkedHashSet or TreeSet in Java.
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.TreeSet;
/**
* Java program to demonstrate difference between TreeSet, HashSet and LinkedHashSet
* in Java Collection.
* @author
*/
public class SetComparision
{
public static void main(String args[]){
HashSet<String> fruitsStore = new HashSet<String>();
LinkedHashSet<String> fruitMarket = new LinkedHashSet<String>();
TreeSet<String> fruitBuzz = new TreeSet<String>();
for(String fruit: Arrays.asList("mango", "apple", "banana")){
fruitsStore.add(fruit);
fruitMarket.add(fruit);
fruitBuzz.add(fruit);
}
//no ordering in HashSet – elements stored in random order
System.out.println("Ordering in HashSet :" + fruitsStore);
//insertion
order or elements – LinkedHashSet storeds elements as insertion
System.err.println("Order of element in LinkedHashSet
:" + fruitMarket);
//should be sorted order – TreeSet stores element in sorted
order
System.out.println("Order of objects in TreeSet
:" + fruitBuzz);
//Performance test to insert 10M elements in HashSet, LinkedHashSet
and TreeSet
Set<Integer> numbers = new HashSet<Integer>();
long startTime = System.nanoTime();
for(int i =0; i<10000000; i++){
numbers.add(i);
}
long endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("Total time to insert 10M
elements in HashSet in sec : "
+ (endTime - startTime));
// LinkedHashSet performance
Test – inserting 10M objects
numbers = new LinkedHashSet<Integer>();
startTime = System.nanoTime();
for(int i =0; i<10000000; i++){
numbers.add(i);
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("Total time to insert 10M
elements in LinkedHashSet in sec : "
+ (endTime -
startTime));
// TreeSet performance Test – inserting 10M objects
numbers = new TreeSet<Integer>();
startTime = System.nanoTime();
for(int i =0; i<10000000; i++){
numbers.add(i);
}
endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("Total time to insert 10M
elements in TreeSet in sec : "
+ (endTime -
startTime));
}
}
Output
Ordering in HashSet :[banana, apple, mango]
Order of element in LinkedHashSet :[mango, apple, banana]
Order
of objects in TreeSet :[apple, banana, mango]
Total time to insert 10M elements in HashSet in sec : 3564570637
Total time to insert 10M elements in LinkedHashSet in sec : 3511277551
Total time to insert 10M elements in TreeSet in sec : 10968043705
When
to use HashSet, TreeSet and LinkedHashSet in Java
Since all three implements Set interface they can be used for
common Set operations like not allowing duplicates but since HashSet, TreeSet and LinkedHashSet has there
special feature which makes them appropriate in certain scenario. Because of sorting
order provided by TreeSet, use TreeSet when you
need a collection where elements are sorted without duplicates. HashSet are rather general purpose
Set implementation, Use it as default Set
implementation if you need a fast, duplicate free collection. LinkedHashSet is
extension of HashSet and its more suitable where you
need to maintain insertion order of elements, similar to List without compromising
performance for costly TreeSet. Another use of LinkedHashSet is for
creating copies of existing Set, Since LinkedHashSet preservers
insertion order, it returns Set which contains same elements in same order like
exact copy. In short, although all three
are Set interface implementation they offer distinctive feature, HashSet is a
general purpose Set while LinkedHashSet provides insertion order
guarantee and TreeSet is a SortedSet which stores
elements in sorted order specified by Comparator or Comparable in Java.
How to
copy object from one Set to other
Here is code example of LinkedHashSet which
demonstrate How LinkedHashSet can be used to copy objects from one
Set to another without losing order. You will get exact replica of source Set, in terms
of contents and order. Here static method copy(Set source) is written
using Generics, This kind of parameterized method provides type-safety and help
to avoid ClassCastException at runtime.
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
import java.util.Set;
/**
* Java program to copy object from one HashSet to another using LinkedHashSet.
* LinkedHashSet preserves order of element while copying elements.
*
* @author Javin
*/
public class
SetUtils{
public static void
main(String args[]) {
HashSet<String> source = new
HashSet<String>(Arrays.asList("Set, List, Map"));
System.out.println("source : " + source);
Set<String> copy = SetUtils.copy(source);
System.out.println("copy of HashSet using LinkedHashSet: " +
copy);
}
/*
* Static utility method to copy Set in Java
*/
public static <T> Set<T> copy(Set<T>
source){
return
new LinkedHashSet<T>(source);
}
}
Output:
source : [Set, List, Map]
copy of HashSet using LinkedHashSet: [Set,
List, Map]
Always code for interface than implementation so that you can replace HashSet to LinkedHashSet or TreeSet when your
requirement changes. That’s all on difference
between HashSet, LinkedHashSet and TreeSet in Java. If you know
any other significant difference between TreeSet, LinkedHashSet and HashSet which is
worth remembering than please add as comment.
Other tutorials from Java Collection Framework
Source:http://javarevisited.blogspot.com/2012/11/difference-between-treeset-hashset-vs-linkedhashset-java.html
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar